Science's Reproducibility Crisis Is Not a Bug. It's the Business Model.
Surface Story
A significant share of published scientific studies fail when other researchers attempt to replicate their results, prompting widespread concern across fields including psychology, medicine, and nutrition about the reliability of the scientific literature.
Underneath the Story
The reproducibility crisis is not a failure of individual scientists but the predictable output of a funding and career system that rewards novelty and publication volume over rigor and verification. Journals profit from publishing surprising findings, universities profit from grant-winning researchers, and grant agencies respond to political pressure to show results - meaning every institutional actor is incentivized to accelerate the pipeline, not audit it. Replication studies, the mechanism that would actually correct the record, produce no career capital and attract almost no funding.
Science's credibility problem is a straightforward consequence of paying scientists to produce papers rather than to produce truth.